Another possible fictional feedback from aig.

[Crazyharp81602]

Me again!

Here's another feedback from aig that states that they have just recieve a so-called "breath of fresh air" after they have recieve a so-called "negative feedback" from a person who is identified as "W.W. USA."

Here's the link.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2005/0107.asp

Now it's your turn to clear up the so called "creation confusion."

So have at it.

BTW, does anyone have a clue to who is really the "W. W." from USA who wrote that fictional feedback?

Crazyharp81602

[Donnmathan]

Feedback: Use the scientific method to explore the universe.
AiG: As we do, within the framework God revealed in Scripture, just as the creationist founders of modern science did also.


:rolling: :rolling: :rolling:

[Valentine Pontifex]

Me again!

Here's another feedback from aig that states that they have just recieve a so-called "breath of fresh air" after they have recieve a so-called "negative feedback" from a person who is identified as "W.W. USA."

Here's the link.

http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/feedback/2005/0107.asp

Now it's your turn to clear up the so called "creation confusion."

So have at it.

BTW, does anyone have a clue to who is really the "W. W." from USA who wrote that fictional feedback?


On what grounds are you think the feedback is fictional? I saw no reason to even so much as expect it. Indeed that is something that one of their "sheep" could very well write.

Unless you can provide strong and compelling reasons for us to believe that W.W. was made up by the AiG staff then you should cease and desist in making such allegations. If anything the an allegation only makes our side seem like it is grasping at straws -- it only helps AiG. Even if it did not help them, it is still very much wrong to make such allegations without good reason. In any event, the burden of proof is on you.

[Crazyharp81602]

On what grounds are you think the feedback is fictional? I saw no reason to even so much as expect it. Indeed that is something that one of their "sheep" could very well write.

Unless you can provide strong and compelling reasons for us to believe that W.W. was made up by the AiG staff then you should cease and desist in making such allegations. If anything the an allegation only makes our side seem like it is grasping at straws -- it only helps AiG. Even if it did not help them, it is still very much wrong to make such allegations without good reason. In any event, the burden of proof is on you.

I'm sorry. My mistake. Thanks for pointing it out. :o

Thank for reminding me that I cannot make any wrongful judgements like that.
I didn't know that I was making those wrongful of allegations. I didn't know that they were wrongful alligations that could get Aig the upper hand. You are right. I was wrong. I'm sorry. Forgive me. I won't do that kind of a thing again. I didn't know that what I was saying is wrong. It's good to know that there are those like you who can point out my errors and show me what's wrong with them and encourage me to apologize and to remind me to never make the same mistake I made ever again. Thanks for pointing it out. That was very rash of me to do that and I will cease and desist making a judgmental post like that. I'll keep that in mind.
Forgive me.

Thanks once again.

Crazyharp81602

[Crazyharp81602]

Here, let me rephrase the post I made.

"Me again!"

"Here's another feedback from aig that states that they have just recieve a so-called "breath of fresh air" after they have gotten a so-called "flaming debatable feedback."

"Here's the link."

http://www.answersingenesis.org/hom...k/2005/0107.asp

"Now it's your turn to clear up the so called 'creation confusion.' "

"So have at it."

Sorry about the original post I made.

I need to be carefull on message boards like these just like what my mother says to me a lot of times when I tell her about what I'm doing on the PC.

So, What's your imput on the feedback?

Crazyharp81602