JLK
August 3, 2005, 07:56 PM
... at least that's the spelling Faux superimposed, as John Gibson interviewed him, following Bush's pronouncement.
Bill said ID is the inevitable future of science, Bush has tremendous courage and foresight, ID is in no way religious, Aristotle would be an IDist if he lived today, intelligence is unnatural but not supernatural, etc. etc.
After all the criticism he's suffered, really scary to see Dembski as much in his own fantasy world of self-delusion as Hovind. And with the same breathtaking smug self-confidence.
(Gibson BTW is the FauxNewsOperative who said
-the Olympic Committee (IOC) "missed a golden opportunity" because, if France had been selected to host the 2012 Olympics, terrorists would "blow up Paris, and who cares?",
-the US "provides you Canadians' your standard of living",
-Karl Rove deserves a medal for outing Wilson's wife, and
-news stuff that was determined by the British independent regulator and competition authority for UK communications industries (Ofcom) (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/pcb_11/upheld_cases?a=87101) to have been "in breach of Sections 2.1 (respect for truth), 2.7 (denying opportunity to take part), and 3.5(b) (personal view - opinions expressed must not rest upon false evidence) of the Programme Code."
Bill said ID is the inevitable future of science, Bush has tremendous courage and foresight, ID is in no way religious, Aristotle would be an IDist if he lived today, intelligence is unnatural but not supernatural, etc. etc.
After all the criticism he's suffered, really scary to see Dembski as much in his own fantasy world of self-delusion as Hovind. And with the same breathtaking smug self-confidence.
(Gibson BTW is the FauxNewsOperative who said
-the Olympic Committee (IOC) "missed a golden opportunity" because, if France had been selected to host the 2012 Olympics, terrorists would "blow up Paris, and who cares?",
-the US "provides you Canadians' your standard of living",
-Karl Rove deserves a medal for outing Wilson's wife, and
-news stuff that was determined by the British independent regulator and competition authority for UK communications industries (Ofcom) (http://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/obb/prog_cb/pcb_11/upheld_cases?a=87101) to have been "in breach of Sections 2.1 (respect for truth), 2.7 (denying opportunity to take part), and 3.5(b) (personal view - opinions expressed must not rest upon false evidence) of the Programme Code."