Phil McCracken
August 7, 2005, 01:19 AM
. . . U.S. biologists being compared to aparthied?
The control that evolution supporters hold over the debate “is a kind of an intellectual apartheid,� said Doug Groothuis, professor of philosophy at Denver Seminary and author of 10 books that explore the relationship between science and technology and belief….
http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/226
Reading Dembski's blog can be enlightening, in so far as you get to see the Wedge Document in action, and how utterly bereft of ideas the ID movement truly is. The sycophantic comments from his dittoheads can also be amusing. Also, you can occasionally catch a glimpse inside the bizarre psychology of an ID champion when, for example, Dembski solicits from his dittoheads an image of his face, superimposed on the body of a pro wrestler, "pile-driving" a similarly superimposed face of Charles Darwin. Is he seeking professional help for his homoerotic delusions of grandeur?
The control that evolution supporters hold over the debate “is a kind of an intellectual apartheid,� said Doug Groothuis, professor of philosophy at Denver Seminary and author of 10 books that explore the relationship between science and technology and belief….
http://www.uncommondescent.com/index.php/archives/226
Reading Dembski's blog can be enlightening, in so far as you get to see the Wedge Document in action, and how utterly bereft of ideas the ID movement truly is. The sycophantic comments from his dittoheads can also be amusing. Also, you can occasionally catch a glimpse inside the bizarre psychology of an ID champion when, for example, Dembski solicits from his dittoheads an image of his face, superimposed on the body of a pro wrestler, "pile-driving" a similarly superimposed face of Charles Darwin. Is he seeking professional help for his homoerotic delusions of grandeur?