crocodile deathroll
September 2, 2005, 08:30 AM
If you are truly serious about consulting anyone about any future natural disaster then would it be better if you consulted an expert in meteorology if it is weather related, a seismologist if it is geologically related.
Why are people so easily ripped off by soothsayers and clairvoyants who's track record in predicting any natural disaster fall way of the mark of what any orthodox scientist could predict.
The proof is in the pudding here (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00060286-CB58-1315-8B5883414B7F0000)
Link here (http://www.centenary.edu/news/2005/May/0003.html)
The author of numerous articles--in Forbes, the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Science, Washington Monthly--Mark Fischetti rates among his more "interesting" feature articles 'Why Not a 40 mpg SUV?' and 'The Future of Television,' which appeared as cover stories in Technology Review, and 'Drowning New Orleans,' which was first published in Scientific American and then featured on National Geographic TV. Our First-Year Experience faculty have also reprinted it in their reader Negotiating Uncertainty.
CDR
Why are people so easily ripped off by soothsayers and clairvoyants who's track record in predicting any natural disaster fall way of the mark of what any orthodox scientist could predict.
The proof is in the pudding here (http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00060286-CB58-1315-8B5883414B7F0000)
Link here (http://www.centenary.edu/news/2005/May/0003.html)
The author of numerous articles--in Forbes, the New York Times, Sports Illustrated, Science, Washington Monthly--Mark Fischetti rates among his more "interesting" feature articles 'Why Not a 40 mpg SUV?' and 'The Future of Television,' which appeared as cover stories in Technology Review, and 'Drowning New Orleans,' which was first published in Scientific American and then featured on National Geographic TV. Our First-Year Experience faculty have also reprinted it in their reader Negotiating Uncertainty.
CDR