PDA

View Full Version : Hell is Hades and Tartarus, most direct link to Paganism


Malachi151
October 21, 2006, 09:09 AM
I see many examples today of people wondering why Jews don't have anything about Heaven and Hell, which of course is because Heaven and Hell are pagan concepts.

One thing we know is that the oldest texts of the New Testament in Greek use both the words Hades and Tartarus, and the description of these places by Christians matches the Greek descriptions of these places.

I've read Josephus' commentary on Hades to the Greeks, whcih describes a his Jewish view of Hades (very similar to the ideas fo Christian heaven, hell, and purgatory), but this seems itself to have been already influenced by the pagans themselves.

Does anyone have a good reference to ancient pagan descriptions of Hades and Tartarus? I'm looking for origional pagan texts, not modern summaries.

Thanks

Malachi151
October 21, 2006, 10:08 AM
Ahh, found one good quote from Plato:

http://www.gutenberg.org/files/13726/13726-8.txt

Apology, Crito, and Phaedo of Socrates, by Plato

those who appear to have passed a middle kind of life,
proceeding to Acheron, and embarking in the vessels they have, on these
arrive at the lake, and there dwell; and when they are purified, and
have suffered punishment for the iniquities they may have committed,
they are set free, and each receives the reward of his good deeds,
according to his deserts. But those who appear to be incurable, through
the magnitude of their offenses, either from having committed many and
great sacrileges, or many unjust and lawless murders, or other similar
crimes, these a suitable destiny hurls into Tartarus, whence they never
come forth. 144. But those who appear to have been guilty of curable yet
great offenses--such as those who, through anger, have committed any
violence against father or mother, and have lived the remainder of their
life in a state of penitence, or they who have become homicides in a
similar manner--these must, of necessity, fall into Tartarus. But after
they have fallen, and have been there for a year, the wave casts them
forth, the homicides into Cocytus, but the parricides and matricides
into Pyriphlegethon. But when, being borne along, they arrive at the
Acherusian lake, there they cry out to and invoke, some those whom they
slew, others those whom they injured, and, invoking them, they entreat
and implore them to suffer them to go out into the lake, and to receive
them, and if they persuade them, they go out, and are freed from their
sufferings, but if not, they are borne back to Tartarus, and thence
again to the rivers. And they do not cease from suffering this until
they have persuaded those whom they have injured, for this sentence was
imposed on them by the judges. 145. But those who are found to have
lived an eminently holy life, these are they who, being freed and set at
large from these regions in the earth as from a prison, arrive at the
pure abode above, and dwell on the upper parts of the earth. And among
these, they who have sufficiently purified themselves by philosophy
shall live without bodies, throughout all future time, and shall arrive
at habitations yet more beautiful than these which it is neither easy to
describe, nor at present is there sufficient time for the purpose."

lpetrich
October 21, 2006, 02:24 PM
The Hell Words of the Bible (http://www.what-the-hell-is-hell.com/HellStudy/HellCharts.htm) shows us how the words for "hell" are translated in various Bible translations:

"Sheol" is found only in the Old Testament, which has no descriptions of what it's like in there.

The New Testament has "Gehenna", "Hades", and "Tartarus", with "Tartarus" occuring only once. Tartarus was the Hellenic-pagan Hell, and Hades was the more usual Hellenic-pagan destination, a place where one would have a drab and shadowy existence.

Gehenna was originally a smoldering garbage dump near Jerusalem, and the Gehenna of the NT is closest to the common view of Hell as a place where you get burned alive forever and ever and ever. There are indirect references to such a place, like a "fiery furnace" and a "lake of fire" where the wicked will be sent to.

One noncanonical NT-related work, the Apocalypse of Peter (http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/apocalypsepeter.html), goes into a lot of detail about the various punishments of Hell -- Dante's Inferno was not the first, and it certainly does not deserve the blame for the eternal people-fry view of Hell.

And the New Testament was anticipated by Hellenistic-era Jews who believed in eternal punishment, like the authors of the Book of Enoch (more on such literature at Peter Kirby's Early Jewish Writings (http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/), including translations).

But I do agree that the notion of eternal punishment likely has pagan origins -- and Zoroastrians also believed that there is a Hell that the wicked will be sent to.

And the Epicureans considered their belief in non-existence after death a liberation from needless fears of eternal torment.

Malachi151
October 21, 2006, 02:38 PM
Yes, Hellenistic Jews did describe Hades in a way similar to Christian Hell, but I think that this itself came from the "pagan" influence and was a part of the various mixing of Judaism and Hellenism.

I think the writings on Hades and Tartarus by Plato, both quoted in my previous post and in his other works, clearly forshadow the Hellenistic Jewish, and Christian notions of the afterlife, which are quite different from early Judaism.

The "lake of fire" and brimstone ideas clearly comes from the description of the Greek underworld as a place with lakes and rivers of fire and noxious sulfer, which in turn, they themselves admit comes from volcanos.

Loomis
October 21, 2006, 11:29 PM
Gehenna was originally a smoldering garbage dump near Jerusalem, and the Gehenna of the NT is closest to the common view of Hell as a place where you get burned alive forever and ever and ever. There are indirect references to such a place, like a "fiery furnace" and a "lake of fire" where the wicked will be sent to.You might want to read what Leolaia (and John Day) (http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/71230/1.ashx) have to say about this.

Leolaia appears to know more about “God” than anyone else on the Internet. :notworthy:

Joan of Bark
October 22, 2006, 05:44 AM
Didn't the Hebrews eventually accept the concept of hell, however? If they did, then I hypothesize it was because they could no longer sell the "if you're a bad boy YHWH will punish you in your lifetime" argument. (Just a hypothesis, I have no evidence to support it).

Malachi151
October 22, 2006, 07:21 AM
Didn't the Hebrews eventually accept the concept of hell, however? If they did, then I hypothesize it was because they could no longer sell the "if you're a bad boy YHWH will punish you in your lifetime" argument. (Just a hypothesis, I have no evidence to support it).

I think that definately had something to do with it.

lpetrich
October 22, 2006, 06:46 PM
I wonder how far back one can trace "Gehenna" or "Ge Hinnom" (Hinnom Valley) for Hell. It is a common term in Rabbinical Judaism, but is apparently absent from Hellenistic Judaism or first-century Judaism (Philo, Josephus). However, the Gospels and early Xians like Justin Martyr had used it.

The Arabic word for Hell, "Jahannam" is clearly derived from this (g -> j often in Arabic).

Looking back further, we find the idea of punishment after death in some ancient Egyptian funerary texts, which were guidebooks for the next world. The Papyrus of Ani, a version of the "Book of the Dead" from Egypt's 19th Dynasty, around 1250 BCE, is the best-known of these.

Many of them feature a judgment of the dead, in which you make a "Negative Confession", as it is usually called. Your heart will be put in a scale with a feather in the opposite pan. You must then assert that you have not committed any of a long list of sins, and if your heart is too weighed down by falsehood and sin, it will be eaten by the part-crocodile part-lion part-hippopotamus monster Ammit.

However, early Mesopotamian afterlife beliefs resembled Hades and Sheol.


It would be interesting to examine the converse, beliefs in "Heaven" or "Paradise". The only part of the New Testament that goes into detail about it is the Book of Revelation, whose New Jerusalem is presumably that place. Elsewhere in the NT, it is described even less than Hell, sometimes being called "eternal life".

Hellenic paganism had a Heaven: the Islands of the Blessed and the Elysian Fields; Virgil described the Elysian Fields as a part of the underworld with a very pleasant climate where people can do what they enjoy doing.

And Plato describes Socrates in his Apology as saying how great the next world will be, how he can get to meet notables like Homer and Hesiod and Orpheus and Musaeus. However, Socrates did not seem to fear eternal punishment.

Ancient Egyptians also had a Heaven, the Reed Fields, and Zoroastrianism also has a Heaven.

WishboneDawn
October 23, 2006, 06:24 AM
"Sheol" is found only in the Old Testament, which has no descriptions of what it's like in there.


I never equated 'Sheol' with hell. I thought it was a neutral term (in the snese that it's neither heaven nor hell) for after death?

Jedi Mind Trick
October 23, 2006, 09:11 AM
I never equated 'Sheol' with hell. I thought it was a neutral term (in the snese that it's neither heaven nor hell) for after death?

Sheol is “the pit” or “the grave” and is equivalent to hell as in “the hidden place.”
Hell is an old word (English?) that refers to a hidden place. It used to be said that the potato farmer would “hell” the potato when he buried it or young lovers would meet in a hell (hidden place).

What I don't think has a counterpart is the christian concept of "the lake of fire" that into which hell (the hidden place, the grave, the pit, sheol) will be thrown. The lake of fire is the eternal burning place of torment not hell.

Malachi151
October 23, 2006, 09:17 AM
The word hell has Germanic origins, and of course so do many English words, but I believe that "Hell" the word was introduced from German/Dutch translations.

That's really beside the point. The point is that the Christian concepts of afterlife clearly come from Hellenistic Greek culture and indeed all of the words used by the origional NT authors to describe the afterlife are the Greek place names.

The idea of "afterlife heaven" being some place up above the earth and Hades and Taratrus being hot places below the earth, with rivers and lakes of fire, where bad people are tormented potentially for eternity, all comes from the Greeks.

WishboneDawn
October 23, 2006, 09:49 AM
The word hell has Germanic origins, and of course so do many English words, but I believe that "Hell" the word was introduced from German/Dutch translations.

That's really beside the point. The point is that the Christian concepts of afterlife clearly come from Hellenistic Greek culture and indeed all of the words used by the origional NT authors to describe the afterlife are the Greek place names.

The idea of "afterlife heaven" being some place up above the earth and Hades and Taratrus being hot places below the earth, with rivers and lakes of fire, where bad people are tormented potentially for eternity, all comes from the Greeks.

Our (christian's) idea of heaven is a greek concept as well, no?

Malachi151
October 23, 2006, 10:21 AM
Our (christian's) idea of heaven is a greek concept as well, no?

Clouds, pearly gates, golden arches, angels with wings.... ummm.... :angel: :banghead: :D

lpetrich
October 23, 2006, 05:56 PM
The details of that common depiction of Heaven are very non-Greek -- that's essentially being a Xian angel living at cloud level in the sky. And it's also a takeoff of the Book of Revelation's New Jerusalem, which will be a city with gold-paved streets and walls of precious stone.

And according to that book, the inhabitants of this New Jerusalem will wear white robes that had been washed in the blood of the Lamb (don't ask me to make sense out of that -- is this some metaphorical kind of washing?). The halos are likely a modification of the glowing-head imagery of angels and saints and the like that one can see in some Byzantine artwork.

Interestingly, Dante's conception of Heaven was living in interplanetary space according to the Ptolemaic cosmology. the Earth is round and at the center, and each celestial object is on a crystalline sphere that surrounds it. The Moon, Mercury, Venus, the Sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, the stars. But it seems like a rather colorless existence.

The Hellenic-pagan "Heaven" was the Islands of the Blessed and the Elysian Fields. Virgil (70 BCE - 19 CE) describes the Elysian Fields (http://www.philomuse.com/kingfisher/lab/elysian.htm) as an especially nice part of the underworld rather than a place in the sky:
They passed to the happy region of green and flowering glades,
the groves where the favored dwell, the blessed haunt of the heroes.
A purer ether enfolds them and clothes them in larger soft light;
a sun of their own shines above, their own stars call them to slumber.
Some find delight in wrestling in rings made soft by the grass;
some exercise well-trained muscles in arenas of golden sand.
Others delight in the steps of the dance or the singing of verses;
Orpheus, dressed as a bard, fits musical notes to the epic,
sweeping the lyre with this fingers, or plucking with ivory plectrum.
(somewhere in the Aeneid)
And according to Pindar (518-438 BCE) (Islands of the Blessed (http://www.forumancientcoins.com/cparada/GML/IslesBlest.html)),
For them doth the strength of the sun shine below,
While night all the earth doth overstrow.
In meadows of roses their suburbs lie,
Roses all tinged with a crimson dye.
They are shaded by trees that incense bear,
And trees with golden fruit so fair.
Some with horses and sports of might,
Others in music and draughts delight.
Happiness there grows ever apace,
Perfumes are wafted o'er the loved place,
As the incense they strew where the gods' altars are
And the fire that consumes it is seen from afar.

I wonder what sorts of Heaven that Hellenistic and first-century Jews looked forward to.

But for being absolutely sybaritic, it is hard to compete with the Islamic Paradise. :D

Malachi151
October 24, 2006, 05:59 PM
I found this interesting:

http://members.citynet.net/morton/images/lheavens.gif

djrafikie
October 24, 2006, 06:18 PM
Loving the elevators.

WishboneDawn
October 24, 2006, 07:00 PM
Looks like an oil refinery. :)

judge
October 24, 2006, 07:25 PM
The Hell Words of the Bible (http://www.what-the-hell-is-hell.com/HellStudy/HellCharts.htm) shows us how the words for "hell" are translated in various Bible translations:

"Sheol" is found only in the Old Testament, which has no descriptions of what it's like in there.


Actually in the Aramaic version of the NT sheol is found and is not the same as ghenna, although both seem to have been translated as hell in the greek.

In Luke 16 (http://www.peshitta.org/pdf/Luqach16.pdf) the dead man is in sheol.

But in Luke 12:5 (http://www.peshitta.org/pdf/Luqach12.pdf) Jesus warns of ghenna.

As happens on many occasions the greek loses the extra information in the aramaic text.

lpetrich
October 26, 2006, 04:38 PM
That Aramaic version is a translation of the Koine Greek version, so what words it uses is irrelevant here, just as it is irrelevant what words a Modern Greek translation uses, a Latin translation uses, or an English translation uses.

judge, if you wish to argue that that Aramaic version is the original version of the New Testament, please do so -- in another thread. And please accept that the burden of proof is on you, just as Jesus mythers have been willing to do.

judge
October 28, 2006, 12:01 AM
That Aramaic version is a translation of the Koine Greek version, so what words it uses is irrelevant here, just as it is irrelevant what words a Modern Greek translation uses, a Latin translation uses, or an English translation uses.

judge, if you wish to argue that that Aramaic version is the original version of the New Testament, please do so -- in another thread. And please accept that the burden of proof is on you, just as Jesus mythers have been willing to do.

No the burden is just as much on you.

Until the evidence is subjected to peer review we cannot say which one came first.

Or should we just accept it withiout peer review?

Here yet again we have evidence for an Aramaic original.

The greek translators rightly translated sheol as hades, but then having no word corresponding to ghenna they also translated it as hades.

the fact is that sheol does exist in the NT.

Mythra
October 28, 2006, 12:22 AM
The Roman Aeneas in Virgil's work (written to honor Caesar Augustus in the first century BCE) witnesses Hell's firey waters and the eternal torture of the damned by Hell's keepers:

"From his vantage point, Aeneas can see Phlegethon's rushing, fiery current, which churns the white-hot boulders in the moat. The Fiery Tisiphone, wearing a bloody mantle, guards the unyielding gate from atop an iron tower. The sounds of dragging chains, grating iron, and savage lashings do not drown out the groans and cries of the prisoners, beyond the fortress's three ring of walls." (p. 69. Alan E. Bernstein. The Formation of Hell, Death and Retribution in the Ancient and Early Christian Worlds. 1993. Cornell University Press. Ithaca & London)

From the online article "Hell's Pre-Christian Origins: Hell, Hell-Fire, Dragons, Serpents, and Resurrections"

here (http://www.bibleorigins.net/hellsorigins.html)

Malachi151
October 28, 2006, 06:24 AM
The Roman Aeneas in Virgil's work (written to honor Caesar Augustus in the first century BCE) witnesses Hell's firey waters and the eternal torture of the damned by Hell's keepers:

"From his vantage point, Aeneas can see Phlegethon's rushing, fiery current, which churns the white-hot boulders in the moat. The Fiery Tisiphone, wearing a bloody mantle, guards the unyielding gate from atop an iron tower. The sounds of dragging chains, grating iron, and savage lashings do not drown out the groans and cries of the prisoners, beyond the fortress's three ring of walls." (p. 69. Alan E. Bernstein. The Formation of Hell, Death and Retribution in the Ancient and Early Christian Worlds. 1993. Cornell University Press. Ithaca & London)

From the online article "Hell's Pre-Christian Origins: Hell, Hell-Fire, Dragons, Serpents, and Resurrections"

here (http://www.bibleorigins.net/hellsorigins.html)

Great, thanks. I have realized that Dante's Divine Comedy is really Greek mythology, as is most Christian art and literature from the 12th-17th centuries.

lpetrich
October 28, 2006, 09:03 AM
No the burden is just as much on you.
The burden of proof is on whomever makes the extraordinary claim. And your Aramaic-first hypothesis is such a claim.

It's the same burden that Jesus-mythers are willing to accept, so I don't see why your position is so special.

The greek translators rightly translated sheol as hades, but then having no word corresponding to ghenna they also translated it as hades.
Except that the NT uses geenna (Gehenna; Strong 1067) several times, and the Septuagint always translates OT Sheol (Strong 07585) as Hades.

judge
October 28, 2006, 05:27 PM
The burden of proof is on whomever makes the extraordinary claim. And your Aramaic-first hypothesis is such a claim.

It's the same burden that Jesus-mythers are willing to accept, so I don't see why your position is so special.

But doesn't your position just become blind faith?
We are supposed to accept greek first just because evryone else believes it.

It seems, to me, the best way to conclude these matters is to have the evidence scrutinised by peer review.

I can understand why religious fundamentalists want to believe without any recourse to the evidence.
What baffles me is why infidels and skeptics insist on doing the same.
Shouldn't we form opinions on such things only after thouroughly examining the evidence?

Malachi151
October 28, 2006, 05:43 PM
But doesn't your position just become blind faith?
We are supposed to accept greek first just because evryone else believes it.

It seems, to me, the best way to conclude these matters is to have the evidence scrutinised by peer review.

I can understand why religious fundamentalists want to believe without any recourse to the evidence.
What baffles me is why infidels and skeptics insist on doing the same.
Shouldn't we form opinions on such things only after thouroughly examining the evidence?

This isn't blind faith, and Christians themselves know they they were written in Greek. There is tons, upon tons of evidence to support that they were written in Greek, and its never even suggested otherwise, with the exception of Matthew, which pretty much everyone now agrees was also written in Greek.

judge
October 29, 2006, 01:09 AM
This isn't blind faith, and Christians themselves know they they were written in Greek.

Oh come on!
Something is correct because christians tell us it is. Please don't be ridiculous.




There is tons, upon tons of evidence to support that they were written in Greek,

Really.... such as?

Malachi151
October 29, 2006, 09:50 AM
Oh come on!
Something is correct because christians tell us it is. Please don't be ridiculous.

Really.... such as?

How about you do the research yourself, we aren't your personal librarians.