PDA

View Full Version : If I... (versed bible readers welcomed)


Sign Related
May 18, 2008, 07:00 PM
...wrote a book, and pre-stated the writting at face value in the book must also be translated into antonyms, would it be a more entertaining book to you?

The intent to such a book would be to get ppl aware that there are under laying facts included all in the meaning to any word. When you read the meaning to a word in a dictionary you should know to also include whether the word is a noun or etc. (which I bet you don't overlook)...and also include its antonyms (which I bet you do overlook) and synonyms (which I bet you don't overlook)...and also include its origins (which I bet some overlook or simply dont care about)...and also include its italic put sentence examples (which I bet you don't overlook) in how the word may be used.

After I make this taught, and put to be taught in schools worldwide, I'd like for ppl to then re-read the Bible as to see the full truth as though truth is a twoedged sword out of the mouth to words (Thus the tree of knowledge of good and evil. Hints: *Caugh* opposites must also be read for, concerning reading and understanding the very word content). If the bible's true intent is revealing "truth", then you should read for the truth in its full context. Such includes the whole listing to a word which includes the word's opposites, does it not?

Yes, you could write a book that makes sense at face value while it also makes sense as what is under laying.

Since the bible was meant to be written truth, you should have already knew to read its face value and also its under laying value.

Does anyone else see what I've been caught on to concerning an author's higher intent for you in what all there can and may and might and would and shall and should be for you to do with reading to intrepret their work in full?

^^And if it didn't occur to you to do so yet, so-called versed bible readers, then you have yourself to blame for missing out the full scoop by having found total bliss with only half truths to bible books content.

All in all, overlooked opposites (antonyms) are as facts laying right under your nose. Take a sniff to raise them up like the spirit of life that entered into the two witnesses so that they stood upon their feet. The feet are on the bottom of you. When you read a word in a dictionary, what is listed on the bottom? The antonyms! It's as the feet of a word. Bow to the feet :notworthy: , so-called versed bible readers. Turns out you werent so versed after all, huh? True winners abmit to having been fools before moving on.

TheRealityOfMan
May 18, 2008, 07:05 PM
I guess I have to start reading the dictionary again. I think I got as far as Aardvark last time.

Sign Related
May 18, 2008, 07:42 PM
And if you thought this thread was frontin', then ask yourself why the character Jesus would say "verily, verily" which stresses "in truth, in truth" as though to two sides to be aware of. The two-edged sword didnt come out the mouth in Rev for it not to have a factoring implication either.

The truth ppl been reading into all along was only a half truth. There is the sheep and there is the other sheep not of this fold that MUST be ALSO brought! Just read John again to see my point.

The written bible is to be read in consideration of all perspectives from the literal to the etc, from the like to the as, from the etc to the etc, etc. if it's intended to be truth in full! Ppl taking sides who would say it's only literal, are only half-truthers...likewise in vice-versa. You understand now when you're dealing with truth? In other words, cant be no half steppin' because there can be none in the TRUTH. It's just a shame how truth has to be stressed inorder for ppl to read into its entire sides. You all who would only look at the syntonyms, are the half-truthers/half-steppers.

Keith&Co.
May 18, 2008, 08:43 PM
And if you thought this thread was frontin', then ask yourself why the character Jesus would say "verily, verily" which stresses "in truth, in truth" as though to two sides to be aware of. Or, Jesus was using an idiom in which a double-positive should be read as a negative?

Sign Related
May 19, 2008, 12:40 PM
Which of you want to see how the bible makes sense in an antonym version? Check this below when you're ready for the other half of the TRUTH...

Some examples with Revelation at face value with under laying fact under it in bold:

And I saw one of his heads as it were wounded to death; and his deadly wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.

^^And I saw one of her heads as it were wounded to life; and her lively wound was healed: and all the world wondered after the beast.


And there was given unto him a mouth speaking great things and blasphemies; and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months.

^^And there was recieved unto her a mouth speaking weak (or: insignificant) things and blasphemies; and incapacity (or: weakness) was recieved to her to cease forty and two months.


And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.

^^And she had incapacity (or: weakness) to receive death unto the original of the beast, that the original should both speak, and cause that as few (or: single) as would not worship the original of the beast should be revived.

Here are some examples from the Gospel with under laying fact following under in bold:

For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

^^For few shall leave (or: depart) out my name, saying, I am Antichist; and shall deceive few.


"Whosoever shall seek to save his life shall lose it; and whosoever shall lose his life shall preserve it."

^^Whoso never shall seek to save her death shall lose it; and whoso never shall lose her death shall destroy it.


And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake.

^^And ye shall be loved of all women for my name's sake.

^^Since loved is pastence it means that ye another will hate in presentence. Got to have an eye for detail.


Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.

^^Out falsity I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.

^^This truth reveals that the bible is a story with things that shall come true.


So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just, And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

^^So shall it be at the beginning of the world: the angels shall leave (or: depart) forth, and sever the good (or: virtuous) from among the biased, And shall cast them into the furnace of fire: there shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

He answered and said unto them, He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man; The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.

^^She answered and said unto them, She that soweth the wicked seed is the Daughter of woman; the tares are the children of the good one; The friend (or: ally) that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the beginning of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned out the fire; so shall it be out the beginning of this world.

^^Out the fire can imply rather being burned in something else such as an acid.

Anyhow, does anyone now see how something intended to be recieved as truth of all truth also makes senses in antonym formate which it should?

Keith&Co.
May 19, 2008, 12:55 PM
Anyhow, does anyone now see how something intended to be recieved as truth of all truth also makes senses in antonym formate which it should?
Not at all.

And you're a little haphazard in antonymification.

For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

^^For few shall leave (or: depart) out my name, saying, I am Antichist; and shall deceive few.

Shouldn't that be

^^For few have left (or: departed) out your soul, hearing, You are Antichist; except won't be honest to few.

Or something. What's the antonym of name? Name is what others give us, others call us. Our internal soul is what we really ard.
If you're playing opposite day with meaning, shouldn't you oppose verb tenses? Subjets?

Bleah. The main message seems to remain, though: If it's godbreathed, then no matter how you fuck around with the words, the Faithful will still maintain that it's evidenced of god's meaning, will and desire.

Sign Related
May 19, 2008, 03:13 PM
Anyhow, does anyone now see how something intended to be recieved as truth of all truth also makes senses in antonym formate which it should?
Not at all.

And you're a little haphazard in antonymification.

For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.

^^For few shall leave (or: depart) out my name, saying, I am Antichist; and shall deceive few.

Shouldn't that be

^^For few have left (or: departed) out your soul, hearing, You are Antichist; except won't be honest to few.

Or something. What's the antonym of name? Name is what others give us, others call us. Our internal soul is what we really ard.
If you're playing opposite day with meaning, shouldn't you oppose verb tenses? Subjets?

Bleah. The main message seems to remain, though: If it's godbreathed, then no matter how you fuck around with the words, the Faithful will still maintain that it's evidenced of god's meaning, will and desire.

Let me point out that "I" doesnt have an antonym. Obviously it's like which "you" to which person would be the antonym to the particular "I"? Thus you should see why it, along with other certain words, don't have any antonym. Ceratin words may have a definition that has words that have antonyms to them...Such as "verily". It means: in truth. Look up the antonyms to "in" and "truth" with a dictionary that includes antonymns.

More examples so to see how sense is made even so:

And, behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.

^^And, behold, I leave (depart) slowly; and my reward is with me, to recieve every woman according as her play (or rest) shall be.


^^Wow. Side note: Putting ourselves "with" Jesus means we will recieve every woman like Jesus says the other (antonym) truth. Life shall go on and on etc. so we're each looking at an endless supply of women of our own. And we'll each be their play (play can be for sex to etc). Forget 72 virgins when we can have an endless amount of every woman in reward style so that you know they'll look how we each want our's and act how we each want our's! Dont know about you half truthers, but I like the antonym aspect to the bible truth.

For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.

^^For as a snare shall it leave (depart) on all them that dwell on the face of the part earth.

^^Damn! This is truth coming to light indeed because ppl have been dwelling on the face (synonyms) part and not the other (antonyms) part.

^^No one cant deny that fact either no matter how big of an ego they have.

Keith&Co.
May 20, 2008, 04:29 PM
Let me point out that "I" doesnt have an antonym. Does 'singular' have an antonym? 'Multiple' would be the first thing to come to mind.
First person would have an antonym of third person.
So if 'I' is first-person singular, then 'they' is third-person multiple.


Obviously it's like which "you" to which person would be the antonym to the particular "I"? Look, i'm not saying that antonym interpretation is easy. But if you're going to make an antonym of the Books, then make a complete antonym of the Books. Every word that can be replaced with something of opposite meaning should be.


Thus you should see why it, along with other certain words, don't have any antonym. But why, then choose not to insert opposites in every case that you possibly can? You're cherry picking words to shape to your process.

On the other hand, of course, the entire point you're trying to sell just comes out as crazypants anyway. Doing a better job of selling the point just makes the point sillier.

Sign Related
May 21, 2008, 10:52 AM
Fixing an example:

Out falsity I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled.

^^"pass away"'s antonym is "begin"

Out falsity I say unto you, This generation shall not begin, till all be fulfilled.

:wave: