PDA

View Full Version : Fundy attacks. Attack = null


EGGO
August 20, 2003, 04:21 AM
That ongoing battle with the uneducated fundy is still going on. It's still just as amusing to me.

how does evolution explain the begiining of the earth? You deny that God did it so what then?

I'm pretty sure the answer is that there isn't correct? But it seems silly to think 'poof' we just became. Especially since science seems to show a lot of creationism false.

1) rocks dont factor in eh. then what? again evolution denies the possiblity of God or at least you do so what happened in the begining I wonder.
2) Christianity doesn't say we are dirt. Adam was formed from dirt yea. it says that, but of course thats with an all powerful God, otherwise it wouldnt make sense, you can't really use science to prove we came from dirt.

This is in response to Division By Zero's semi-sarcastic reply...
If he thinks this argument is sound, he should agree that Christianity says we're nothing but dirt- no different from the dirt that animals roll around in, trample all over, and dump excretion on. Gee- not only are we seperate from animals, we're not even AS GOOD as animals!

obviously evolution doesnt include God so you have to come up with some theory to explain the begining of our existance, and isnt it that we came from a primordial soup?

Pretty much so.

if evolution doesn't include God then im wondering what it says about the begining. Yes Adam came from dirt but it obviously would make more sense if an all powerful God did it versus a random act in nature

No, it would seem much SIMPLER. If we can't imagine ANY kind of answer for anything, it's always easier to just say "Goddidit" which is what the beginning of human civilization tended to do.

Heathen Dawn's earlier reply to him
1. Sun and moon are described as "two great lights". Fact: neither is very great, and only one is really a light.

2. The only races accounted for in Genesis are the Semites (Shem), North Africans (Ham) and Europeans (Japheth). Chinese, Amerindians and Australians, to name just a few, are missing.

His reply to this...
1) Well the moon can still be considered a light. even though it doesnt give off its own, doesn't it reflect the sun? and well lets take the sun away and see if you don't call it great. Its great because its what God designed so that organisms could survive on this planet and both are the biggest we can see on this earth. You just gotta think in the perspective of the bible
2) Not really my strong point. Races. In the bible there are alot of races, I generally dont associate ethnicity with them, just groups of people that lived in certain areas. Mind you thinks (he meant things) have changed since the old testament. The people that lived in former england werent they conquered and bred with the Germanic tribes that brought the destruction of Rome? Again weak point so this is all I have to say. It could just be also that it wasn't that important in the bible to mention them.
3) Well the firmament as proposed by one creationist could have been a layer of ice above the earth atmosphere. This would have increased air pressure and filtered out harmful rays from the son which could explain why Adam lived to be 900+ . This ice melting well could have cause it to rain.

1) I'm not one for cosmology. Maybe I'll be lazy and let you guys pick that one up.

2) Same as above, replace cosmology with history. I'll be looking this up.

3) I think I'm laughing at that. A layer of ice covering the earth. I don't think that even could've filtered out harmful rays of the sun. And I don't think that filtered harmful rays from the sun (much less from a sheet of ice) will keep a man living 900+ years...

Genesis I and II differ in the order of creation, and with the facts as described by science.

Just because it left out Adam being created in the part II doesnt mean it happened in that order. Science is nothing more than man explanations for why things are, which tends to ignore God. So what if right now interbreeding didnt work with our genes, can't you just consider that possible the DNA back then might have been different. Afterall isn't that what you believe in with evolution that there are mutations. Perhaps it mutated after awhile and then they couldnt interbreed, but back then they could.

I had to read this 5 times to understand what he was saying.
I think to clarify, he's stating that our genes have mutated (looks like for the worse) to the point where we can't interbreed. But back then, our genes were better, so we COULD interbreed.

Reverse, you fool, reverse! God was created in man's image.

What are you talking about!. Man was created in Gods Image!!! Man didnt create God, and God wasn't based on Man's Image. Seriously, and I almost thought i had a typo.


Funny, 'back in the day', a lot of things were said to be the doings of god. As they were proved false, all of a sudden he's pushed aside, doing his best to fit our image.

Here he goes on saying we're not animals

1) According to mans classification yes, we are very similar. However, according to the bible we aren't. Everytime as I can remember in the bible animals have been mentioned seperatly from humans. We have souls, and face judgement;animals dont. We were created in God's image. Animals weren't. We can choose between good and evil; animals well dont have to worry about concerning themselves with good/evil, they just do what God told and made them to do. Doesnt mean they aren't smart or affectionate or that we are better because if you look in Numbers chapter 22 I believe it talks about a donkey that talked thanks to God, that prevented a person from getting killed by an angel. Man isnt greater than animals, we both die but we are different.

Not too long ago he said we WERE above animals. Anyway, after telling him about the scientific classification, and heck, even micro-biology, he still insists that we're some sort of....thing. (What are we if we're not animals?)

Adam wasn't real.
The Bible is not a science textbook. Hares don't chew their cud, despite what Leviticus says.

yes he was. and what is sceince but mans feeble attempt to explans things that God has done. Ive never had a bunny before, Eating regurgitated food sounds gross but you never know, ive seen all sorts of animals eat worser things they have produced.

OPEN UP A SCIENCE BOOK. Find out what hares eat.

No, man wasn't created. There is ample evidence to the contrary of this. You have to provide actual evidence that we were created ex nihilo (or some dirt) rather than run to the bible, which is only believed because it's the Word of God--and we know it's the word of God because it says so.

do i? what is better that Adam was made from dirt by God or nothing at all from sceince.

A big universal rule, matter can't be made from nothing. That's the whole thing about the primordial soup right? We came from the most primitave of ingredients (to coin a term) and came up to become what we've become now.

He's pretty draaaaaaaang retarded if he didn't even realize that populating the entire Earth from two people would involve incest.

God planned it to happen this way. It may be gross to you guys and ritefully so, its illegal and immoral today ever since the time of Moses however, back then that was how God planned it.

So God again just magically said "...well I think that's enough of incest. The world is populated enough now I guess".

Something in me (that's voicing itself unclearly at the time) wants to argue about why couldn't God just make a group of people, and then just have them do their stuff, instead of making 2 people who would have incesting children, and then waste more god-juice (he uses a cheat code to get infinate of that) to make incest just...wrong.

God never changes but he can change his rules which is what he did with moses.

If he changes his rules, can we call him (or those rules) perfect? Why didn't he just 'cut to the chase' and make it so that we can't inbreed and blah blah (read above)

I suppose I could say prove the earth is millions of years old when obviously niether of us has lived that long

Through geology, and other brances of science, it can be proven. Of course, he just proves his fallacy by showing us how easy it is to just say 'goddidit' when we just don't know.


The first genetic species? Once we track it down, we'll let you know how deformed it is.
im sure the child wont be deformed but lets wait and ask God when we die shall we? Besides I thought I read in time magazine that some geneticists said we probably came from two people (a man and women obviously)

Never saw that article. Did anybody else? *sigh* I hate looking for all these articles or whatever this guy brings up through Google. I don't understand the meaning of that first part of the hope-to-be-refute.

Actually, there was a group of them--populations evolve, NOT individuals. There wasn't a "first" man, so to speak--there was afirst group, but that is all we can really say.

No, all you need is a rock. (he believed evolution says we all came from a rock)
ok enough bashing on the rock, you guys haven't given me a proper substitute for the begining of the world, and again I seem to remember a time artcile this year that was done on genetics that said we could have come from two people.

Proper-substitute = 'goddidit' henceforth ;)
*goes back to Google looking for this article*

(talking about how single celled organisms reproduce asexually)
you fail to see my point which is a living thing has never gone from asexual single celled to sexual complex organism in the history of humanity. Its my creationist theory vs. your evolution theory or as Id like to put it my religion vs yours.

Well duh, that's all you base your theories on, religion. I however have non. *goes on*
Well...macro-evolution DOES take a few thousand years. If you happen to see a protazoa change into a cow, I'll be sure to say it was the work of God (if man didn't aid in it of course) ;)

(trying to refute how we said people weren't genetically perfect in the beginning with things like Asthma and Down's Syndrome)
yes it sucks, God didnt create death that was man or otherwise put Adam's original sin. O and thats 4 diseases I see, though i dont think Asthma is a genetic disease since it can be cured. Yes it can, my cousin had it when he was young and chubby but he pulled off a theodore rosevelt and buffed up and now is an excellent swimmer/water polo person who can hold his breath longer than I can lol. The point is though that even if the person is suffering as that, the kid can overcome some of those problems and even if it is painful God will be merciful. Some down sydrome people have lived productive lives even if it is hard. life is hard, it wasn't meant to be but it is and its one of those things that one has to cope with. Whats sad is that some people choose to deny God and then suffer throughout eternity in hell when all the pain could go away after they die, if theyd only accept Jesus.

...I'll leave that to you guys. I may be suffering from asthma right now as well, since I can't breathe because I'm laughing so hard.

pre solar nebule. eh? was there ever such a thing o.O Has anyone actually even seen a galaxy or star born. I dare say not. Sure we've seen the collapse of stars but being born. o.O Also this stuff is matter which i later asked where did it come from?

But thanks to the study of atoms, we can theorize how a star is born neh? That's how we create our good 'ol synthetic material. He fails to realize that it's made by a lot of stuff just floating around...correct? *goes back to his books to see if this is correct*

Where did God come from?
Why can he come from there/pre-exist but nothing else can?
Can you objectively prove genesis at all? You know, with evidence other than the Bible?
1)This is hard for such small words we humans have. I suppose I can put it this way. He is a being from which all in existance comes from. He is the begining and the end so there is in a sense no dimesion of time with him, its just eternity. Limitless power. Its basically he is the source of everything and the explanation to creation. Time, space, dimension, matter all come from him, and he is not random.
2) because he is the source, it ends with him unlike it ends with nothing and a complete random act.
3) Can you objectivly prove evolution besides with mans feeble attempts to explain how we are here with silly theories like coming from single celled organisms. You evidence is no greater than mine. In a sense it boils down to belief vs. belief which is relgion vs. religion.

1) That's right, he was just always here. For some reason, how he complains how everything must have an origin, he can't even give a good half-assed explanation where God came from except "He was always there" which to my mind is just physically and logically impossible.
2)He makes it sound as if "I gave birth to this thing. Therefore, I shall end this thing."
We all know that's a bit stupid. Plenty of dogs were given birth by another dog, but they were run over by a vehicle. And I don't see why it's God's plan, since animal's don't have a soul, why would it matter what happens to them?
3) Wrong? Make a child with another woman, THAT'S evolution right there. Why isn't the appendix so critical? We were created in God's image, and he gave us useless body parts like the tailbone?


Comments, please, please. Once you stop laughing I'd like to hear your input. :D

Division By Zero
August 20, 2003, 07:49 AM
Originally posted by EGGO
I'm pretty sure the answer is that there isn't correct? But it seems silly to think 'poof' we just became. Especially since science seems to show a lot of creationism false.
Right. Theories about the origins of the universe or even the origins of life are completely irrelevent to the theory of evolution.


1) rocks dont factor in eh. then what? again evolution denies the possiblity of God or at least you do so what happened in the begining I wonder.
What happened in the beginning is irrelevent. The claim "humans evolved from rocks" is idiotic, and NO evolutionist makes this claim.

2) Christianity doesn't say we are dirt. Adam was formed from dirt yea.
Wait, wait... you mean there's more to it than just "We are dirt?" The claim "We are dirt" leaves out some important steps? Impossible. That would mean my argument was a strawman- just like his argument about rocks!


obviously evolution doesnt include God so you have to come up with some theory to explain the begining of our existance
There is no mention of the construction of the very first automobile in the owner's manual for my car. That doesn't mean it has to come up with an alternate theory to explain where cars came from.

Abiogenesis is irrelevent to evolution.


and isnt it that we came from a primordial soup?
From single-celled organisms. Abiogenesis, which is seperate from evolution, claims that those single-celled organisms came from a primordial soup. Not from rocks.

if evolution doesn't include God then im wondering what it says about the begining.
Absolutely nothing, and it doesn't need to.

Yes Adam came from dirt but it obviously would make more sense if an all powerful God did it versus a random act in nature
We don't see dirt organizing itself into amino acids and proteins and things of that nature. But "primordial soup" is not dirt.

1) Well the moon can still be considered a light. even though it doesnt give off its own, doesn't it reflect the sun?
You mean... you mean the Bible contains figurative language?

and well lets take the sun away and see if you don't call it great. Its great because its what God designed so that organisms could survive on this planet and both are the biggest we can see on this earth.
I kinda doubt that the word "great" in this context was supposed to mean "totally awesome, dude." Any experts want to comment?


3) Well the firmament as proposed by one creationist could have been a layer of ice above the earth atmosphere. This would have increased air pressure and filtered out harmful rays from the son which could explain why Adam lived to be 900+ . This ice melting well could have cause it to rain.
1) Evidence for... eh, there's too many things that require evidence in that statement. Somebody else do it.


Just because it left out Adam being created in the part II doesnt mean it happened in that order. Science is nothing more than man explanations for why things are, which tends to ignore God. So what if right now interbreeding didnt work with our genes, can't you just consider that possible the DNA back then might have been different. Afterall isn't that what you believe in with evolution that there are mutations. Perhaps it mutated after awhile and then they couldnt interbreed, but back then they could.
Maybe, maybe, maybe. Don't you have anything besides maybes? Where's your evidence that incest would have at one time not been a problem?

Note to infidels: This proposal doesn't even sound possible. Any geneticists here want to explain why or why not?



im sure the child wont be deformed but lets wait and ask God when we die shall we? Besides I thought I read in time magazine that some geneticists said we probably came from two people (a man and women obviously)
He's referring to Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam, most likely. I don't know much about them, but I do know they are more or less unrelated ideas seperated by millions of years, and are certainly not two contemporary human beings.


ok enough bashing on the rock
There will be no cessation of rock-bashing until you admit that "humans evolved out of a rock" is something that NO evolutionist, anywhere, claims. It is nothing but a creationist strawman to get a chuckle and an "amen" from the herd.

you guys haven't given me a proper substitute for the begining of the world
We don't need to, and even if we did think humans evolved from a rock, which we don't, it still wouldn't be an answer for the beginning of the world. What do you think you're arguing here?

2) because he is the source, it ends with him unlike it ends with nothing and a complete random act.

You didn't answer the question of why the universe needs a creator, but God- an infinitely more complex being- does not.

3) Can you objectivly prove evolution besides with mans feeble attempts to explain how we are here with silly theories like coming from single celled organisms. You evidence is no greater than mine. In a sense it boils down to belief vs. belief which is relgion vs. religion.
Actually, it boils down to logical fallacies (that's creationism) vs. evidence (that's evolution). What would YOU accept as evidence for evolution?

conkermaniac
August 20, 2003, 09:11 AM
how does evolution explain the begiining of the earth? You deny that God did it so what then?

How does the Riemann Hypothesis explain why Chad is in Africa?

Christianity doesn't say we are dirt. Adam was formed from dirt yea. it says that, but of course thats with an all powerful God, otherwise it wouldnt make sense, you can't really use science to prove we came from dirt.

So why did an all-loving God choose to make us out of dirt rather than something else? I mean, come on, dirt is pretty much the lowliest thing on the planet. Why not wood? Or clay? But dirt?

I suppose I could say prove the earth is millions of years old when obviously niether of us has lived that long

You know, I have more faith in radiocarbon dating -- however inaccurate you may believe it to be -- than a book filled with more absurdities and violence than Harry Potter.

im sure the child wont be deformed but lets wait and ask God when we die shall we? Besides I thought I read in time magazine that some geneticists said we probably came from two people (a man and women obviously)

He's probably talking about mitochondrial Eve. And like most creationists, he doesn't have a clue what it means.

you fail to see my point which is a living thing has never gone from asexual single celled to sexual complex organism in the history of humanity.

Yeah, I mean it's so easy to turn an ameoba to a human. I'm sure it only takes a few seconds for the protozoa to evolve...and poof...you have a full-grown human.

Whats sad is that some people choose to deny God and then suffer throughout eternity in hell when all the pain could go away after they die, if theyd only accept Jesus.

Then why is God being so unfair? Even if both a "normal" person and a person affected by Down Syndrome had an equal chance to go to Heaven, is it fair that the person with Down Syndrome had to suffer so greatly while the other one lived a comfortable, normal 70-80 years?

Kronos
August 20, 2003, 10:10 AM
The Thing is, creationists believe that their God created everything, because that is what they want to believe... And no one will convince them otherwise. :banghead:

I have always failed to comprehend how anyone with a mind of his/her own and maybe a highschool understanding of Chemistry could not believe in evolution.

how does evolution explain the begiining of the earth? You deny that God did it so what then?

It Doesn't. Evolution has NOTHING to do with the creation of the earth itself. Evolution is all about how all different forms of life came to be as they are today from what they were billions of years ago, and it is still an ongoing process.
As far as the earth's beginning is concerned, that's all straight forward science. Let me explain:

When a star is born (such as our sun), it ignites with a giant explosion, sending lots of energy and matter into space. The Hydrogen atoms (specifically the nuclea)that was in the star fuses through nuclear fusion thus making heavier elements such as helium. This happens over and over because of all the extra energy around, to form heaver elements still, like the metals.
All matter attracts other matter (Newtons gravitational law). the elements pack together making a bigger mass, thus attrackting the other big pieces and finaly making planets.

Note: that is the very short version.

As for evolution. With the little chance there is of chemical reactions happening in the first place, Considdering all the factors that influence reactions, such as the speed of the atoms, the reletive energy of each one and the astronomical distance in between these atoms, Reactions still occur billions of times a second just in your near environment. Now imagine what could happen in a billion years!!! Somewhere, 2 Carbon atoms react. Then that molecule reacts with some hydrogen and again with some oxygen (maybe in the heat of sub crust magma), and BANG, you have a organic compound. And so on and so forth...

Jeez, Call me a Science Preacher!!!
Sorry if the scientific explination is a little off topic, just wanted to add some light to the mystery.

Whats sad is that some people choose to deny God and then suffer throughout eternity in hell when all the pain could go away after they die, if theyd only accept Jesus.

AND

but lets wait and ask God when we die shall we

I feel sorry for you. 'Cause when you die and discover that there is no god, you can't go back and change the way you did things.

EGGO
August 20, 2003, 07:05 PM
Something else I just got as I read this. Get out your notebooks...

According to him, the moon is still a light because it reflects light from the sun. If this is the case, then every object in the universe that doesn't emit light...IS a light.

EVERYTHING reflects light neh?

Doubting Didymus
August 20, 2003, 07:16 PM
Originally posted by EGGO
EVERYTHING reflects light neh?

Well, nearly.

keyser_soze
August 20, 2003, 09:13 PM
99.99 percent anyway. I guess he'll always be in the DARK though when it comes with his HOLE filled arguments that hardly MATTER in the first place.;)

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ
August 21, 2003, 02:45 AM
1) Well the moon can still be considered a light. even though it doesnt give off its own, doesn't it reflect the sun?

So? So does a mirror--we don't call it a light. We call it a mirror.

and well lets take the sun away and see if you don't call it great.
Its great because its what God designed so that organisms could survive on this planet

Except when they get skin cancer from too much of it. Go sure likes giving free stuff constantly, but take advantage of it, you suffer agony. Given this, it would be safe to assume that Christians go to hell, since they partake of the free gift of salvation and aren't exactly shy about it.

and both are the biggest we can see on this earth. You just gotta think in the perspective of the bible

Why does god make a reflector at night? A really crappy one? One that only helps teenage boys get laid and gives horror writers something to focus on?

Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ
August 21, 2003, 03:55 AM
how does evolution explain the begiining of the earth? You deny that God did it so what then?

Does the bible tell you how to trim your toenails, or what happened in China in 230 BC? No, and for a reason--that isn't its job. The theory of evolution explains only the changes that populations of living organisms go through over time. Asking it to explain where the earth comes from is like asking the New Testament for answers about the third century BC in China.

1) rocks dont factor in eh. then what? again evolution denies the possiblity of God or at least you do so what happened in the begining I wonder.

I wonder too. Evolution makes no claims as to the origin of life itself--it only makes a claim as to what happens to existing populations (and when there are limited resources to compete for).

2) Christianity doesn't say we are dirt. Adam was formed from dirt yea. it says that, but of course thats with an all powerful God, otherwise it wouldnt make sense, you can't really use science to prove we came from dirt.

No, you can't, because we didn't.
With an all-poerful God, couldn't this whole of existence be zapped in two seconds from now, with our memories and all the evidence for any age also fabricated simutaneosly? For all you know that is exactly what happened. In fact, why wouldn't an all powerful being do this, especially to us pathetic little mortals? What, he loves us? That's a riot. Why should an all-encompassing, entirely self-sufficient, all-powerful, all-knowing being feel this emotion towards us? Moreover, how could he feel this before our existence? He does predate us, afterall.

obviously evolution doesnt include God so you have to come up with some theory to explain the begining of our existance, and isnt it that we came from a primordial soup?

No, we don't really. We could just use God to prime the pump so to speak. But we don't. We admit to not having knowledge of exactly what went on--we have a few ideas, but nothing that is really good at all.

if evolution doesn't include God then im wondering what it says about the begining. Yes Adam came from dirt but it obviously would make more sense if an all powerful God did it versus a random act in nature

Yes, a fully grown man springing from dirt is much more plausible if God did it than if it just happened one day. But since this isn't at all what is being postulated, then the comparison fails entirely.

2) Not really my strong point. Races. In the bible there are alot of races, I generally dont associate ethnicity with them, just groups of people that lived in certain areas.
[/qote]
EGGO, we NEED A LINK TO THIS. That way, WinAce can put it on his site!

To the person who wrote that: that's what ethnicity IS, jackass.

Mind you thinks (he meant things) have changed since the old testament. The people that lived in former england werent they conquered and bred with the Germanic tribes that brought the destruction of Rome?

The Normans kicked out the Saxons who were hired to kick out the Angles who were hired to kick out the Jutes who were hired to get rid of the Romans by the Britons (IIRC). Each of these people came from their own areas, had their own language, customs, etc. This is called ethnicity. The ethnicity chaged a lot due to various cultures conquering one another and people bred, and customs got altered.
[quote]
Again weak point so this is all I have to say. It could just be also that it wasn't that important in the bible to mention them.

But it was important to claim that hares and coveys chew the cud when thy really don't.

3) Well the firmament as proposed by one creationist could have been a layer of ice above the earth atmosphere.

Which is highly infeasible for a number of reasons. Because ice is less dense than water, it would have to occupy more volume than the flood did. This much ice that high up would be VERY thick--a few miles, to say the least. Try shining ANY light thorugh that--you'll get crap out. What, did Noah live in perpetual nighttime? Further, let's talk stress on this ice here. Gravity is going to pull it down--all that is keeping it from doing that is it's own mass. Guess what? With that much mass, there is literally that much more force pulling it apart. Noah would have been crushed by a chunk of ice the size of a Volkswagon long before God old him to make an ark.

This would have increased air pressure

Not terribly so. There would be nothing more pushing down on the air--the ice would actually DECREASE the air pressure, due to gravitational attraction to the gasses--they would be pulled upwards, recuing effective mass.

and filtered out harmful rays from the son

What, Jesus's semen?
Anyhow, it wold have more than filtered out harmful rays in the sun--it would have filtered out EVERY RAY PERIOD. Adam would have been in kept in the dark about a lot of things, like apples and nudity.

which could explain why Adam lived to be 900+ .

No, it wouldn't. We don't have replacement parts. Even if you take very very good care of yourself, blood vessels harden and crack--they do so before you're 120 with modern nutrition and diets (which keep us filled with the correct amount of every nutrient at all times with little excess), medicine to prevent disease, and so forth.

It would be much safer if you just had God make the water for the flood and then magic it away afterwards--your explanation actually is more plausible that way.

Oh, and the ice melting--ice would have melted from the sunward side down--most of it would have sublimed off into space, meaning no great flood. But given that all that ice would have been raining down from day one in great hunks, this is pretty moot.


Just because it left out Adam being created in the part II doesnt mean it happened in that order. Science is nothing more than man explanations for why things are, which tends to ignore God. So what if right now interbreeding didnt work with our genes, can't you just consider that possible the DNA back then might have been different. Afterall isn't that what you believe in with evolution that there are mutations. Perhaps it mutated after awhile and then they couldnt interbreed, but back then they could.

It doesn't work that way. In order for a harmful effect to be heriditary, there would have to be a copy in each parent, and it would have to be passed on. With a limited population, these things get passed around like whores in Vegas. Everyone has several copies of lethal genes NOW--and they're diluted. With a smaller population containing the same mutations , they would be more concnetrated--more people die because of them. You're more likely to mate with someone who has a copy of a death gene that way. If you're a blood relative, it's even more likely since you share at LEAST 50% of all alleles. Odds are, you're going to start expressing these.

If you assert that in the last few hundred or few thousand years, all the dozens of fatal genes cropped up on us and were inserted only a few per person, and with random initial assortment, you are pushing for more rapid changes than any evolutionist accets.

1) According to mans classification yes, we are very similar. However, according to the bible we aren't.

According to the Bible, hares chew cud. However, the definition of cud (which hasn't changed at all) is not feces--the're seperate things entirely. Cud hasn't been processed. Feces have. The bible is wrong about one classification, and is rather patent about it, and no revisions have been made in over 2000 years.

Everytime as I can remember in the bible animals have been mentioned seperatly from humans. We have souls, and face judgement;animals dont.

You never had a dog, did you?

We were created in God's image.

Homer Simpson is what God looks like? Hardly awe-inspiring.

Animals weren't.

Which is good, since we see so few Homer Simpsons in the animal world.

We can choose between good and evil; animals well dont have to worry about concerning themselves with good/evil, they just do what God told and made them to do. Doesnt mean they aren't smart or affectionate or that we are better because if you look in Numbers chapter 22 I believe it talks about a donkey that talked thanks to God, that prevented a person from getting killed by an angel. Man isnt greater than animals, we both die but we are different.


We have souls, and face judgement;animals dont.


Man isnt greater than animals

Pick one, please. Souls are a huge improvement over having none, especially according to your theology--you get into heaven if you have one!

yes he was. and what is sceince but mans feeble attempt to explans things that God has done. Ive never had a bunny before, Eating regurgitated food sounds gross but you never know, ive seen all sorts of animals eat worser things they have produced.

Cud is partially digested fibers that need re-chewing.
Shit is entirely processed.
Hares eat fully processed shit, not un-processed/partially processed cud.
These are simple facts.

do i? what is better that Adam was made from dirt by God or nothing at all from sceince.

Why does an all-powerful God need dirt to make man? Given that we are made in his image, would that mean God's image is DIRT then? That would be a very literal intrepetation, wouldn't it? Made of dirt--made in his own image. Sounds like God is a pile of dirt that looks like Homer Simpson. VERY awe-inspiring.

God planned it to happen this way. It may be gross to you guys and ritefully so, its illegal and immoral today ever since the time of Moses however, back then that was how God planned it.

Great plan. I've got a better one, without any incest--starting with a large enough population to keep mother-fucking, daughter-fucking, and sister-fucking from happening! WOrks good, doesn't it? And you don't have to worry about changing laws down the road.

God never changes but he can change his rules which is what he did with moses.

The universe is the rules it operates by. Change the rules, you change the universe. Is God so different from the universe?

ok enough bashing on the rock, you guys haven't given me a proper substitute for the begining of the world, and again I seem to remember a time artcile this year that was done on genetics that said we could have come from two people.

No, the clsest we have is that we all have the same "mother"--mitochondrial Eve. Of course, considering the nature of mitochondria, this is no surprise.

you fail to see my point which is a living thing has never gone from asexual single celled to sexual complex organism in the history of humanity.

Given that humanity's history is shorter than all of history, this is unsurprising.

Its my creationist theory vs. your evolution theory or as Id like to put it my religion vs yours.

You can call it ass-sex versus blahajalk;rjo;ia aftarja;wera for all I care. Doesn't mean one of them is real.
pre solar nebule. eh? was there ever such a thing o.O Has anyone actually even seen a galaxy or star born. I dare say not. Sure we've seen the collapse of stars but being born. o.O

Um, we have--that's how we know about them. See, the universe is a very big place--the earth is to the universe as an atom is to the earth (LITERALLY)--so, naturally, we see lots of nebulae forming stars and in virtually every stage in between--and that's within our own galaxy.

Also this stuff is matter which i later asked where did it come from?

Where did God come from?

For every existent, there can always be the question of its origin. I pose you a more fundamental one than you pose of me. It is only fair that you answer first :).

But my answer is this--there was a massive release of energy a long time ago--this is the inital creation of the Universe. It's very energetic, so due to mass/energy relations, there is almost no mass. This changes because that much energy tends to do things like that--it makes a lower energy state.

That is where matter (very roughly) comes from. Now, where does God come from?

yes it sucks, God didnt create death that was man or otherwise put Adam's original sin.

Actually, man didn't created death. God said you would die if you did x--that sorta puts the whole creation bit in his hands.

O and thats 4 diseases I see, though i dont think Asthma is a genetic disease since it can be cured.

Wrong--it CAN'T be cured. The symptoms can be treated--there is a world of difference.

Yes it can, my cousin had it when he was young and chubby but he pulled off a theodore rosevelt and buffed up and now is an excellent swimmer/water polo person who can hold his breath longer than I can lol.

Which isn't a cure at all. The triggers for astham have probably ceased affecting him as much as they used to--my allergies to cats have been lessened since I started hanging out with someone who owns a few very regularly.

The point is though that even if the person is suffering as that, the kid can overcome some of those problems and even if it is painful God will be merciful.

Agony is mercy? I guess that should be on the posters with War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.

Some down sydrome people have lived productive lives even if it is hard.

Requiring loads of outside assistance.

life is hard, it wasn't meant to be but it is and its one of those things that one has to cope with.

If it wasn't meant to be, then why is it? Are you saying God can't pull of his own plan?

Whats sad is that some people choose to deny God and then suffer throughout eternity in hell when all the pain could go away after they die, if theyd only accept Jesus.

So, torture them in life, then torture them in death. That's really good of God. Shouldn't we hold God to a higher standard than man? If I tortured people for the remainder of their lives, and took pains to increase their lifespan, would I not be called a monster? Isn't this exactly what God does?

1)This is hard for such small words we humans have. I suppose I can put it this way. He is a being from which all in existance comes from. He is the begining and the end so there is in a sense no dimesion of time with him, its just eternity. Limitless power. Its basically he is the source of everything and the explanation to creation. Time, space, dimension, matter all come from him, and he is not random.

But that does not answer the question of where he comes from. All beginnings have a beginning--what is his beginning?

2) because he is the source, it ends with him unlike it ends with nothing and a complete random act.

There is no randomness in causality.

3) Can you objectivly prove evolution besides with mans feeble attempts to explain how we are here with silly theories like coming from single celled organisms.

Yup, which is why it's being called science. By the way, our silly theories are far less theory than the ice canopy theory--ours can hold water when examined.

You evidence is no greater than mine.

Um, no--you see, we have at least one piece of evidence. You have none. Where is your evidence that we aren't created two seconds from now with all the memories and other "evidnce" fabricated along with us to give appearance of time?

In a sense it boils down to belief vs. belief which is relgion vs. religion.
Religion is a subset of beliefs, not the other way around.

Our your political opinions religions? If so, then then no two people share the same religion.

Division By Zero
August 21, 2003, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by Jesus Tap-Dancin' Christ
Which is highly infeasible for a number of reasons. Because ice is less dense than water, it would have to occupy more volume than the flood did. This much ice that high up would be VERY thick--a few miles, to say the least. Try shining ANY light thorugh that--you'll get crap out. What, did Noah live in perpetual nighttime?

Oh, and the ice melting--ice would have melted from the sunward side down--most of it would have sublimed off into space, meaning no great flood. But given that all that ice would have been raining down from day one in great hunks, this is pretty moot.

Of course he probably believes in a flat earth, with the sun inside the firmament...

Which of course brings up a whole new set of questions :D

Donnmathan
August 21, 2003, 10:23 PM
Silly question about the whole "Adam had perfect DNA" bit of silliness...wouldn't at least some of our genetic faults HAVE to have been present in the original population? Else they would not be so prevelent today?