Steven Carr
September 7, 2003, 05:00 PM
http://www.reasons.org/resources/apologetics/design_evidences/20020502_life_support_body_prob.shtml?main
Here Ross bashes out lots of things which allow life on Earth.
Such as 'position & mass of Jupiter relative to Earth'
Curiously, he ignores the fact that the level of activity of earthquakes, droughts, epidemics, volcanoes, floods, tornadoes etc has to lie within a certain range or else we would all be wiped out.
Can anybody think of why Ross does not regard this fine-tuning of natural evils as support for his claims of an Earth which is fine-tuned to allow Humanity to exist?
Here Ross bashes out lots of things which allow life on Earth.
Such as 'position & mass of Jupiter relative to Earth'
Curiously, he ignores the fact that the level of activity of earthquakes, droughts, epidemics, volcanoes, floods, tornadoes etc has to lie within a certain range or else we would all be wiped out.
Can anybody think of why Ross does not regard this fine-tuning of natural evils as support for his claims of an Earth which is fine-tuned to allow Humanity to exist?