Family Man
March 29, 2004, 08:19 PM
We're probably all familiar with Fred Hoyle's estimation of the odds of the universe being what it is to be 1:10 to the 40000th power, or that of a 747 spontaneously coming together in a junkyard in a windstorm. Sounds impressive until you start thinking about it.
For example, consider the odds of you existing at this exact moment in time with your exact gene combination. What are the odds? We'll let's start by ruling out such things as the odds that your parents would meet and have sex the day that you were conceived. The fact is that in any fertilization, there are millions of sperms competing to fertilize the one egg your mother provided. For ease of calculation, let's put the odds at a million to one.
But wait, you need to consider the odds that your parents would have their exact gene combination. The odds are now a million X a million X a million or 10 to the eighteenth power. Then about about your grandparents? Now the odds are 10 to the 42nd power. In fact, it takes only going back 16 generations before it is clear that the odds that you could possibly exist is worse than Hoyle's estimate of the odds of the universe -- and that using generous assumptions.
Of course, no one would claim that God must have necessarily picked out the exact egg and sperm to create you and all of your ancestors. Natural forces are enough to explain this, despite of the "odds". And that's where arguments like Hoyle's strike me as bogus. Because we are ignorant of the forces involved in how the universe was made, there may have been a good reason why the universe become the way it is -- despite the odds. It is simply an argument from ignorance.
For example, consider the odds of you existing at this exact moment in time with your exact gene combination. What are the odds? We'll let's start by ruling out such things as the odds that your parents would meet and have sex the day that you were conceived. The fact is that in any fertilization, there are millions of sperms competing to fertilize the one egg your mother provided. For ease of calculation, let's put the odds at a million to one.
But wait, you need to consider the odds that your parents would have their exact gene combination. The odds are now a million X a million X a million or 10 to the eighteenth power. Then about about your grandparents? Now the odds are 10 to the 42nd power. In fact, it takes only going back 16 generations before it is clear that the odds that you could possibly exist is worse than Hoyle's estimate of the odds of the universe -- and that using generous assumptions.
Of course, no one would claim that God must have necessarily picked out the exact egg and sperm to create you and all of your ancestors. Natural forces are enough to explain this, despite of the "odds". And that's where arguments like Hoyle's strike me as bogus. Because we are ignorant of the forces involved in how the universe was made, there may have been a good reason why the universe become the way it is -- despite the odds. It is simply an argument from ignorance.